|
Any economy contains seeds of the destruction. Konsjumerizm, a waste, overproduction and war it is destructive forces of economy of hunting. The United States have been initially blest ' free ' by the earth and resources, abundance of space for territory expansion, expansion of the markets because of unlimited immigration and at last because of destruction of the markets after two great wars. They poorly hold the overseas markets filled with export of their cardinal sin - a debt.
If the United States wish to avoid ' the prosperity state ' and decrease as productivity, and freedom, they should return to principles which more correspond to natural economy, to agricultural model.
If Soviet Union wishes to get rid of economic chaos, he should refuse the feudal / gregarious system and to return to market pricing (which in this case not model of the USA). He should allow to workers to reap the fruits of the initiative, without losing freedom.
The Model of hunting of the United States does not approach for the Russian economic transformations. The agricultural model is most reliable for transition as it contains the elements of protection which are absent at model of hunting, and focus on demand that is the basic necessity in disorder. Manufacture with the offer party as practised the USA, will create the goods which nobody can get, and will complicate a problem.
The Agricultural economy should weaken the isolation, underproduction, an antipathy to risk and the tendency to excessive accumulation. Money should be active in the best traditions of enterprise progressive hunting.
We saw recession in England at ' the prosperity state ' and disintegration of the USSR at communism. Softer agricultural model with the open markets can be a key. We already have two examples: communism of style of Tito and the Japanese corporation of family type. Translating in the American frameworks: participation of working business in profits, narrowing of salaries between management and work, an employment guarantee.
|
